We won't do a 3.65 version of the indoor units. The reason is, the FCC
considers that a mobile device. And if you are connecting a mobile device
you must turn down the power of your base station by pretty much 90%. In
other words, the power allowed by the FCC in 3.65 is not high enough to
enable connection of indoor devices.

This was done on purpose so tu as not piss off the major cell carriers who
spend billions on spectrum capable of providing mobile service, which
includes connecting people inside their homes and businesses. If the FCC
had allowed high enough power in 3.65 to connect it indoor CPE the carriers
would have pitched a fit.
On Feb 19, 2015 1:13 PM, "Steve D" <bigd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Heh, was just going to ask this on the WISPA list, but may as well here:
>  What's the word on indoor units (the 4000's) making their way to LTE
> land?  Firmware upgrade or all new hardware spin?
>
> -Steve D
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Patrick Leary <
> patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Okay then.
>>
>>
>>
>> I commit to being a responsible contributor here. I've joined since I've
>> noticed the archives are populated with a fair number of threads about
>> Telrad and/or the COMPACT -- and among them many incorrect assumptions. I'm
>> here to share info, dispel rumor, and take arrows. I will stay out of
>> threads where I don't belong.
>>
>>
>>
>> We will also plan on going to Chuck's next Animal Farm. Frankly, I did
>> not know it was open, instead assuming it'd be uncouth of us to be there.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Leary
>> Director BD, North America, Telrad
>> 727.501.3735
>> patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG]
>> patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my
>> corporate address]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Patrick Leary
>> Director BD, North America, Telrad
>> 727.501.3735
>> patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG]
>> patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my
>> corporate address]
>>
>
>

Reply via email to