Use Chrome?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com> wrote: > I did a full scan today with my Kaspersky. Seems I'm okay, but I don't > know s**t about that stuff. > > > > *Patrick Leary* > > *M* 727.501.3735 > > <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:48 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > > > Patrick, > This maybe something you may need to look at on your system. > > http://blog.vilmatech.com/remove-heurtrojan-script-generic-redirected-flash-player-page > / > From what I read this is a trojan on the client not server. > > thanks > Dave > > On 03/03/2015 10:46 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: > > FYI David > > [image: Inline image 1] > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David <dmilho...@wletc.com> wrote: > > Yes, > I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back. Steadily moving > with more tower growth and more deployments. > We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is completed working 2 > this next quarter. > We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450 where it makes > sense. > > On 03/03/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: > > We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is showing > performance very close to our 3.65 due to the low noise floor, and I know > you've been reading about how the 3.65 is doing. > > > > Patrick > > Telrad > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David <dmilho...@wletc.com> wrote: > > Agreed but now there could be less room for additional development of > other wireless devices. > Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would be nice like 5.1 > Still plenty of room for us. > > > On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote: > > That's called "malicious interference" and can and should get you fined > and shut down. Further, it is not WISP spectrum and never was. I have never > understood the WISP sense of entitlement with unlicensed (free) spectrum, > especially given that it is a population that is largely politically > conservative. > > On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <t...@nwohiobb.com> wrote: > > That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there towers and make > there signal about worthless? If so that would teach cell phone companies > not to mess with WISP’s spectrum. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > > > If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites across the nation we > are going to see some tough times getting clear channels. I’ve seen several > proposals now for tower based systems that use very large swaths of 5Ghz as > alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with multi-channel BW designed to > suck up every free piece of 5Ghz spectrum found. > > > > http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/ > > > > > *Peter Kranz *Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd > www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > > > > > > > > > -- > > Patrick Leary > > Director BD, North America, Telrad > > 727.501.3735 > > patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG] > > patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my corporate > address] > > > > > > > -- > > Patrick Leary > > Director BD, North America, Telrad > > 727.501.3735 > > patrickleary.af...@gmail.com [this address is only for AFMUG] > > patrick.le...@telrad.com <patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my corporate > address] > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > >
