Yep. 1 watt all time!!!!! Wavespan was one that used FHSS in 5.2 and 5.8 ghz 100mbps with fiber to ODU.
Jaime Solorza On Mar 3, 2015 6:43 PM, "Patrick Leary" <patrick.le...@telrad.com> wrote: > One day you and will hold court over pints (or tequila) and teach folks > how their lives would look very different if the FCC in 2000 had allowed > wide band hopping at regular ISM power. > > > > *Patrick Leary* > > *M* 727.501.3735 > > <http://mkt2.us/TelrdNet> > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:36 PM > *To:* Animal Farm > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > > > I have yet to see a good FHSS radio get knocked off the air be it serial > or Ethernet. I can only speak about GE MDS, Freewave, MaXstream MicroHard > and CalAMP. Canopy 900MHz is still working in many areas of town even near > refinery and water companies MAS farm. TxDOT using MDS and Encom for > ITS....all in the 902-928MHz band with EPEC deploying Itron and Neptune > smart meters...... > > It does take work but so far ..knock on wood > > > Jaime Solorza > > Wireless Systems Architect > > 915-861-1390 > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > > Yeah, stop being cry babies and man up! > > Gino A. Villarini > > @gvillarini > > > > > > > On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Here in the border we have to deal with interference on licensed and > unlicensed bands from another country! Even our Public Safety system was > interfered with and had to be dealt with. Like Gino says, Its part of > doing business in these bands! > > > Jaime Solorza > > Wireless Systems Architect > > 915-861-1390 > > > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Jerry Richardson <je...@richardson.bz> > wrote: > > Yep, lived it. > > > > The discussions PG&E ended with “Our lawyers say we are in compliance, > take it up with them”. > > > > OK then…. > > > > We managed to keep some links up, but ultimately it relegated 900 to very > low density neighborhoods and links that needed to be -65 or better at both > ends. > > > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:02 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5 GHz.. > > > > I think the point some are missing is the lesson learned from 900Mhz and > smart meters. > > > > While 900Mhz is unlicensed spectrum, a single operator has managed to take > it over in California to the point where no other user has any chance of > using the spectrum for commercial purposes. > > > > By this I mean that PG&E’s deployment of smart meters on every power meter > in the area, and on top of power poles, and other high sites, has raised > the noise floor on this band to unusable levels for high speed > communications. > > > > So by means of overwhelming numbers, PG&E managed to take over 900Mhz for > its own users, stranding the investment of ISPs in this spectrum in > affected markets. I don’t think the commissions initial concept of > unlicensed spectrum was that a single operator would do this, I think they > expected operators by this to use licensed spectrum. > > > > I’d like to see a limit on how many systems a particular entity can deploy > in an unlicensed band. It could be some high number, like 1 million units. > > > > > *Peter Kranz *Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd > www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > >
