Interesting,
We use drupal for this site so its possible not sure how it happened
because its sits on a Lamp stack server.
Thanks
Dave
On 03/03/2015 10:46 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
FYI David
Inline image 1
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:16 AM, David <dmilho...@wletc.com
<mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:
Yes,
I love my 3.65 deployment thus far and not looking back. Steadily
moving with more tower growth and more deployments.
We have 4 sites scheduled this year to go on and 1 is completed
working 2 this next quarter.
We are doing a full 3.65 on each site and adding 5Ghz 450 where it
makes sense.
On 03/03/2015 09:23 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
We love 5.15-5.25 though. So far our customer testing is showing
performance very close to our 3.65 due to the low noise floor,
and I know you've been reading about how the 3.65 is doing.
Patrick
Telrad
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:03 AM, David <dmilho...@wletc.com
<mailto:dmilho...@wletc.com>> wrote:
Agreed but now there could be less room for additional
development of other wireless devices.
Also, if they would stay on on side of the band would be
nice like 5.1
Still plenty of room for us.
On 03/03/2015 06:31 AM, Patrick Leary wrote:
That's called "malicious interference" and can and should
get you fined and shut down. Further, it is not WISP
spectrum and never was. I have never understood the WISP
sense of entitlement with unlicensed (free) spectrum,
especially given that it is a population that is largely
politically conservative.
On Mar 2, 2015 12:16 PM, "Tim Reichhart" <t...@nwohiobb.com
<mailto:t...@nwohiobb.com>> wrote:
That means can we point our 5ghz backhaul stuff at there
towers and make there signal about worthless? If so that
would teach cell phone companies not to mess with WISP’s
spectrum.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Peter Kranz
*Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 12:03 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] More LTE tradgedy of the commons on 5
GHz..
If systems like this end up rolling out on cell sites
across the nation we are going to see some tough times
getting clear channels. I’ve seen several proposals now
for tower based systems that use very large swaths of
5Ghz as alternative LTE data paths to cell phones with
multi-channel BW designed to suck up every free piece of
5Ghz spectrum found.
http://www.engadget.com/2015/03/02/t-mobile-alcatel-wifi-and-4g-fight/
*Peter Kranz
*Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/>
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <tel:510-868-1614%20x100>
Mobile: 510-207-0000 <tel:510-207-0000>
pkr...@unwiredltd.com <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com>
--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735 <tel:727.501.3735>
patrickleary.af...@gmail.com
<mailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com> [this address is only for
AFMUG]
patrick.le...@telrad.com <mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this
is my corporate address]
--
Patrick Leary
Director BD, North America, Telrad
727.501.3735
patrickleary.af...@gmail.com <mailto:patrickleary.af...@gmail.com>
[this address is only for AFMUG]
patrick.le...@telrad.com <mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com> [this is my
corporate address]
