can we see the full chart?

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:27 AM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com> wrote:
> 
> Understood, but it's UL still doubles under MU-MIMO. See below the numbers in 
> red the current CPE cannot achieve under its current limit being a cat 4 
> chipset in the CPE. BUT the numbers NOT in red still double under MU-MIMO.
>  
> <image002.png>
>  
> Patrick Leary
> M 727.501.3735
> <image003.png>
>  
>  
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 8:23 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>  
> The AP will support Mumimo. on the CPE, it doesn’t matter.  But Cat4 CPEs 
> only Tx at 16qam on 1 stream, they are not mimo on the upload…
>  
>  
>  
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com   
> @aeronetpr
>  
>  
>  
> From: Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 9:18 AM
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>  
> The current cat 4 CPE will support upcoming MU-MIMO, so it will still enjoy 
> doubling of its current UL even without QAM256 in the CPE. The next CPE will 
> debut at some point this year I am told. I do not know what category it will 
> be. We are trying to get as high up as we can.
>  
> Patrick Leary
> M727.501.3735
> <image004.png>
>  
>  
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 8:14 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>  
> Patrick, what is the roadmap on the CPE? CAt6 coming soon?
>  
>  
>  
> Gino A. Villarini
> President
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> www.aeronetpr.com   
> @aeronetpr
>  
>  
>  
> From: Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com>
> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Date: Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 7:58 AM
> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>  
> I have confirmed. the current base stations can be upgraded and will be 
> upgraded to QAM 256. Your sales rep is incorrect unless he is referring to 
> the current category 4 CPE.
>  
>  
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
> On Mar 5, 2015 3:01 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote:
> Your sales director EMEA.
> So marketing might be more cautious here ;-))
> 
> 
> >Please send me a name, offlist. My understanding has been otherwise and very 
> >clearly so. I am going to verify though.
> >
> >Patrick Leary
> > M 727.501.3735 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:21 PM
> >To: af@afmug.com
> >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
> >
> >My Telrad contact told me that the actual HW is not upgradable to 256 QAM.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
> viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
> 

Reply via email to