I don't need to check Gino. Gone over this a million times. No change in BTS OR 
CPE.

Patrick Leary
 M 727.501.3735 






-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 12:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback

Patrick, please recheck with nick on that.. AFAIK MUMIMO requires diff HW/ 
Antennas? 



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr






On 3/4/15, 1:32 PM, "Patrick Leary" <[email protected]> wrote:

>QAM256 is not new hardware, neither is MU-MIMO
>
>Patrick Leary
> M 727.501.3735
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
>Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:30 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New feedback
>
>>I disagree with the "3 years it is old stuff." The COMPACTs are SDRs 
>>with lots of latent capacity.
>
>Beeing old stuff is relative. We've SAF Luminas 366Mbit we could 
>replace with Integras which do 450Mbit now.
>We've Radwin2000c with 100Mbit we could replace now with Mimosa B5 
>doing easily 400 MBit.
>We've Purewave WiMAX we could upgrade with your's (SDR by the way) ...
>
>Sure within the next 3 years your gear is more or less old and 
>replacing it with your next modell would be a good improvement. SDR 
>might increase the lifetime but e.g. going to 256QAM will be the next hardware.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
>***********************************************************************
>***
>**********
>This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
>PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
>computer viruses.
>***********************************************************************
>***
>**********
>
>
>
>
> 
> 
>***********************************************************************
>***
>**********
>This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by 
>PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & 
>computer viruses.
>***********************************************************************
>***
>**********
>
>
>


 
 
************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************






************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************



Reply via email to