Anybody who thinks they can do whatever they want could end up
criminally charged, whether a landlord, tenant, or an ISP. Sorry, I
don't believe any tenant rights apply in this scenario.
IANAL though.
On 3/17/2015 1:19 PM, John Woodfield wrote:
Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is
such a thing as tenant rights and due process.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner is king
of his castle.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" <john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz
<mailto:john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz>> wrote:
I'm calling BS on this.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson <t...@ida.net
<mailto:t...@ida.net>> wrote:
>
> You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless
of what the tenant told you or even signed.
>
> Travis
>
>> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote:
>>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but
the ISP is
>>> who did the actual damage to the property, without
permission. Yes, they
>>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract
from the
>>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission
to cause
>>> damage to the property.
>>
>>
>> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the
owner with authority?
>>
>> ~Seth
>
