I am not a lawyer and have never played one on TV. This is just a question.
If I hire someone to cut down a tree, I would seem to be implicitly saying to the cutter that I have the right to ask them to cut the tree down. If they cut the tree down but don't have permission of the owner, it would seem that the cutter of the tree is responsible to the owner. If the tree cutter was intentionally mislead that I had the right to cut the tree down, seems like the tree cutter could come after me. Does this sound right? Chuck On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we differ on what constitutes damage. > > Installing a J-mount and a cable penetration, no. > Not sealing the above properly and water or critters intrude upon the > structure, yes. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Tuesday, March 17, 2015 12:26:21 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Angry landlord over Roof mount antenna > > Tenants do not have the right to damage my property, regardless of their > rights and due process. > > Travis > > On 3/17/2015 11:19 AM, John Woodfield wrote: > > Many landlords with that attitude end up criminally charged. There is such > a thing as tenant rights and due process. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Mar 17, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > It sounds right to me. He owns the land and property. Owner is king > of his castle. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On Mar 17, 2015 1:13 PM, "John Woodfield" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm calling BS on this. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Mar 17, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Travis Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > You still have to work it out with the actual owner, regardless of what >> the tenant told you or even signed. >> > >> > Travis >> > >> >> On 3/17/2015 10:16 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> >>> On 3/17/15 9:11, Travis Johnson wrote: >> >>> I would talk to the tenant and try and resolve things, but the ISP is >> >>> who did the actual damage to the property, without permission. Yes, >> they >> >>> "assumed" they had permission, but without a signed contract from the >> >>> legal owner of the property, the ISP does not have permission to cause >> >>> damage to the property. >> >> >> >> >> >> What do you do if your tenants misrepresent themselves as the owner >> with authority? >> >> >> >> ~Seth >> > >> > > >
