Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:34 PM, James Howard <ja...@litewire.net> wrote: > It’s been many years since I had a grammar lesson but I think technically > you told him that he’ll see that Jesus is what’s happening. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 12:29 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > > > hehe > > He just wanted to see Jesus, so I told him he was Jesus. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 12:25:56 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > Are you both Jesus in this situation? > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > Then do what I already told you to do. You'll see what's happening, Jesus. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"That One Guy" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 12:16:27 PM > > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > Im not wanting to alter anything, I just want to see, jesus > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > You can register with every geolocation service known to man and places > still find ways to place you incorrectly. I've got a new one now. > ShadowServer thinks I'm in Glen Ellyn. The IP block has never been in or > near Glen Ellyn. > > One could assume that the middle of a week day is a light NetFlix time and > that they would be pointing you to the nearest location. If they thought he > was in Albuquerque, that could make optimal routing a bit difficult. It > wouldn't just be the gross latency, but the number of peering points and > hops with potential congestion issues. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 12:05:29 PM > > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > I also don’t know how important it is that a CDN be “near” you. > > > > By definition, you’re probably talking a sustained download, either a > video stream or some kind of large file download. And most of the time you > will see 4 parallel TCP connections. I really don’t think latency matters > once you start the download. What does matter is server balancing. If > your DNS server has correct geoIP but Netflix chooses to send your > customers to a server in Dallas, maybe their Chicago servers are overloaded > or undergoing maintenance. Do you really want to second guess their > decisions? About all you can do is make sure your DNS server is in the > right place according to the geolocation database services, and let the > content provider decide what IP address to hand out to your customers and > how to route that IP (they may use geoIP info to decide the routing, not > the DNS). > > > > Now, if your DNS server appears to be in a whole wrong part of the world, > that may have dramatic effects, like totally different content being > available because Netflix thinks your customer is in Europe or Asia. > > > > > > *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> > > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 11:55 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > > > Pardon the mess, I'm on a laptop with a damn touchpad. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"That One Guy" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 11:43:50 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > used the wrong term > > Ignore the term > > Take cache out of thyne mouth > > > > now, being a windows dick, I dont have torch > > > > I want to simply be able to verify that appropriate CDNs are being utilized > > > > namebench is still running, I dont know what its output is going to be > > > > This cant be a new thing, I see threads occasionally about content being > problematic in that users are getting less than desirable CDNs, it always > seems to boil down to DNS, > > > > I just want a tool that will tell me where the content is coming from. (in > a perfect world, it would display on a map with a quality indicator to that > CDN, I dont have any expectation that that component of the tool would > exist) > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > Not generic. You have to use the one they provide. And they will not > give to you unless you are doing some like 4tB per month. > > > > *From:* Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> > > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 10:33 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > > > I was not aware you could cache Netflix streams with a generic caching > server. Not only due to DRM, but also Netflix app switches streams > dynamically to match video quality to connection speed. Plus first the > customer authenticates to Netflix server, chooses what content to watch, > etc. > > > > > > *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> > > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 11:23 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > > > Say a new movie is on Netflix. Or latest season of cards. Everyone is > going to want to watch it. So 1000 simultaneous backbone streams to > Netflix vs 1000 simultaneous streams to the caching server in your NOC. I > choose the latter. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 11:08:27 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > I don’t understand how the caching server is going to help with CDNs. > Actually, with so much Internet content now being either dynamic HTML or > streaming, I wouldn’t think caching would be worth it, unless you are > talking about something like a Netflix OpenConnect appliance. Maybe you > can cache software updates, I’m not sure about that. > > > > > > *From:* That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > > *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 10:35 AM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > > > Geographically close CDNs. I want to make sure we are getting content from > Illinoisish rather than california for netflix, since all that matters is > netflix > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For performance, look at queryperf which I think is provided by ISC/bind. > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by "we are getting good CDNs and the like," > though. > > > > Josh > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:27 AM, That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Im bringing live our first caching server today. Is there a good tool for > comparing queries between DNS servers. > > Im not all that concerned about speed since we are so small there wont be > a huge amount of benefit I would think. Im primarily wanting to make sure > we are getting good CDNs and the like > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Total Control Panel* > > Login <https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net> > > To: ja...@litewire.net > <https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net> > > From: > 0000014c47adc49a-8a273e57-028e-495e-a852-1831cc2a0276-000...@amazonses.com > <https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=3157069305&domain=litewire.net> > > Remove > <https://asp.reflexion.net/FooterAction?ver=2&un-wl-sender-domain=1&rID=242260993&aID=3157069305&domain=litewire.net> > amazonses.com from my allow list > > *You received this message because the domain amazonses.com > <http://amazonses.com> is on your allow list.* > > >
