Are you both Jesus in this situation?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Then do what I already told you to do. You'll see what's happening, Jesus. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"That One Guy" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 12:16:27 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance > > Im not wanting to alter anything, I just want to see, jesus > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> You can register with every geolocation service known to man and places >> still find ways to place you incorrectly. I've got a new one now. >> ShadowServer thinks I'm in Glen Ellyn. The IP block has never been in or >> near Glen Ellyn. >> >> One could assume that the middle of a week day is a light NetFlix time >> and that they would be pointing you to the nearest location. If they >> thought he was in Albuquerque, that could make optimal routing a bit >> difficult. It wouldn't just be the gross latency, but the number of peering >> points and hops with potential congestion issues. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 12:05:29 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >> >> I also don’t know how important it is that a CDN be “near” you. >> >> By definition, you’re probably talking a sustained download, either a >> video stream or some kind of large file download. And most of the time you >> will see 4 parallel TCP connections. I really don’t think latency matters >> once you start the download. What does matter is server balancing. If >> your DNS server has correct geoIP but Netflix chooses to send your >> customers to a server in Dallas, maybe their Chicago servers are overloaded >> or undergoing maintenance. Do you really want to second guess their >> decisions? About all you can do is make sure your DNS server is in the >> right place according to the geolocation database services, and let the >> content provider decide what IP address to hand out to your customers and >> how to route that IP (they may use geoIP info to decide the routing, not >> the DNS). >> >> Now, if your DNS server appears to be in a whole wrong part of the world, >> that may have dramatic effects, like totally different content being >> available because Netflix thinks your customer is in Europe or Asia. >> >> >> *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> >> *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 11:55 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >> >> Pardon the mess, I'm on a laptop with a damn touchpad. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"That One Guy" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 11:43:50 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >> >> used the wrong term >> Ignore the term >> Take cache out of thyne mouth >> >> now, being a windows dick, I dont have torch >> >> I want to simply be able to verify that appropriate CDNs are being >> utilized >> >> namebench is still running, I dont know what its output is going to be >> >> This cant be a new thing, I see threads occasionally about content being >> problematic in that users are getting less than desirable CDNs, it always >> seems to boil down to DNS, >> >> I just want a tool that will tell me where the content is coming from. >> (in a perfect world, it would display on a map with a quality indicator to >> that CDN, I dont have any expectation that that component of the tool would >> exist) >> >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> Not generic. You have to use the one they provide. And they will >>> not give to you unless you are doing some like 4tB per month. >>> >>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>> *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 10:33 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >>> >>> I was not aware you could cache Netflix streams with a generic >>> caching server. Not only due to DRM, but also Netflix app switches streams >>> dynamically to match video quality to connection speed. Plus first the >>> customer authenticates to Netflix server, chooses what content to watch, >>> etc. >>> >>> >>> *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >>> *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 11:23 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >>> >>> Say a new movie is on Netflix. Or latest season of cards. Everyone >>> is going to want to watch it. So 1000 simultaneous backbone streams to >>> Netflix vs 1000 simultaneous streams to the caching server in your NOC. I >>> choose the latter. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Monday, March 23, 2015 11:08:27 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >>> >>> I don’t understand how the caching server is going to help with CDNs. >>> Actually, with so much Internet content now being either dynamic HTML or >>> streaming, I wouldn’t think caching would be worth it, unless you are >>> talking about something like a Netflix OpenConnect appliance. Maybe you >>> can cache software updates, I’m not sure about that. >>> >>> >>> *From:* That One Guy <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent:* Monday, March 23, 2015 10:35 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] testing DNS server performance >>> >>> Geographically close CDNs. I want to make sure we are getting content >>> from Illinoisish rather than california for netflix, since all that matters >>> is netflix >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> For performance, look at queryperf which I think is provided by >>>> ISC/bind. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure what you mean by "we are getting good CDNs and the like," >>>> though. >>>> >>>> Josh >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:27 AM, That One Guy < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Im bringing live our first caching server today. Is there a good tool >>>>> for comparing queries between DNS servers. >>>>> Im not all that concerned about speed since we are so small there wont >>>>> be a huge amount of benefit I would think. Im primarily wanting to make >>>>> sure we are getting good CDNs and the like >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >
