Which distributor made you pre-pay and non-cancelable?

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:32 PM, <t...@nwohiobb.com> wrote:

> Ding ding other winner here and nate is correct
>
> On 2015-03-23 16:50, Nate Burke wrote:
>
>> If he pre-ordered, the Distributor may have put a no-cancel on the
>> order, and made him prepay something.....
>>
>> On 3/23/2015 3:48 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>
>>  Tim, why would you not order them elsewhere and cancel the order
>>> from the distributor who doesn't have stock?
>>>
>>> FROM: Ben Moore
>>> SENT: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:28 PM
>>>
>>> TO: af@afmug.com
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> What exactly would you like me to do? We are telling you where units
>>> are available. As I mentioned distributors place orders at different
>>> times and some new products get ordered sooner than others.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:15 PM, <t...@nwohiobb.com> wrote:
>>> Mike
>>> its one of the main distributor for ubnt and ben wont do anything
>>> about it....
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-23 16:06, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>> Sounds like your distributor sucks. ;-)
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com [1]
>>>
>>> -------------------------
>>>
>>> FROM: t...@nwohiobb.com
>>> TO: af@afmug.com
>>> SENT: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:03:54 PM
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> Well it doesnt help me any if I already got mine ordered but the
>>> distributor is dragging there feet to get mine to me
>>>
>>> On 2015-03-23 15:42, Ben Moore wrote:
>>> Thanks Jeremy!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Streakwave has them (PBE-5AC-620) in stock now. I am picking some
>>> up on will call.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Tim Reichhart <t...@nwohiobb.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>> Ben told me it as been shipping since dec and I have ordered mine
>>> and I keep getting told I wont have mine until may which is totally
>>> uncalled for.
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> FROM: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] ON BEHALF OF Rory Conaway
>>> SENT: Saturday, March 21, 2015 1:37 AM
>>> TO: af@afmug.com
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> Is the PBE-5AC-620 shipping yet?
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>> FROM: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] ON BEHALF OF Rory Conaway
>>> SENT: Friday, March 20, 2015 3:43 PM
>>> TO: af@afmug.com
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> If I set up a new tower with 802.11ac, am I going to have any
>>> problems getting CPE's over the next 3 months? Is there any
>>> chance of supply shortages?
>>>
>>> Rory
>>>
>>> FROM: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] ON BEHALF OF Ben Moore
>>> SENT: Friday, March 20, 2015 2:59 PM
>>> TO: af@afmug.com
>>> SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>
>>> That is the good thing about these...they are being air shipped ;-)
>>> You can imagine what I would say with all of the port issues if
>>> they were going "on the boat" ;)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Josh Luthman
>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I can't think of any. If you take the word "soon" and "on the
>>> boat" out of your emails, we'd save about 15 terabytes of storage.
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [2] [1]
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [3] [2]
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Come on now...I know I have done it at least once before in the
>>>
>>  last
>>
>>  15 years...Man, can't believe it has already been 15 years!!!!
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman
>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well they may or may not be reliable, but you stated a
>>>> quantifiable
>>>> value. That has to be a first.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [2] [1]
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [3] [2]
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey, who says they are accurate??
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Josh Luthman
>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Did Ben...just measure...in accurate numbers?????????????
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [2] [1]
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [3] [2]
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, but should be in distributors hands in ~7-10 days.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:30 PM, That One Guy
>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> this is a cheap link, nanopowerbeams are integrated not
>>>> connectorized
>>>>
>>>> I didnt give much thought to the AF5x since its not in anybodys
>>>> actual hands yet is it?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Mathew Howard
>>>> <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I guess because you're too cheap to spend an extra $400 on the
>>>>
>>>  link?
>>
>>  Personally, I wouldn't... if I'm going to go cheap, might as well
>>>>
>>>  go
>>
>>  all the way cheap and use a pair of NanoPowerBeams.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Josh Luthman
>>>> <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't know why you'd do UBNT AC when you can do AF5x unless it
>>>> needs done in the next couple weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 [2] [1]
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 [3] [2]
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Mathew Howard
>>>> <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the Rockets are the only connectorized units.
>>>>
>>>> The Lite is cheap and can do PtP or PtMP, but does not have
>>>> airprism. The PtP and PtMP have airPrism, but there's apparently
>>>> differences in airprism between the two which means they will
>>>>
>>>  always
>>
>>  be limited to ptp or ptmp, as far as I know this is going to be a
>>>> permanent separation.
>>>>
>>>> The AC radios have faster CPUs and that sort of thing, so they
>>>> are
>>>> going to perform better than the old junk, they also have some
>>>> spiffy features like live airview. The biggest downside to the AC
>>>> line at this point is the lack of DFS and UNII-1.
>>>>
>>>> I personally wouldn't put up anything with the old M5 stuff at
>>>> this
>>>> point unless you need to for compatibility reasons, UBNT AC
>>>> should
>>>> perform best of the three, but ePMP gives you a bit more
>>>>
>>>  flexibility
>>
>>  at this point. I expect AF5x to be better than any of them in
>>>> every
>>>> way.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, That One Guy
>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the only
>>>> connectorized units?
>>>>
>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism
>>>> only?
>>>>
>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>
>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
>>>>
>>>  already
>>
>>  have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot HP
>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but
>>>> I
>>>> dont know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with
>>>> UBNT
>>>> of ptp and ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>
>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms
>>>> of
>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>
>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
>>>> products there?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
>>>> the team.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the
>>>
>>  team.
>>
>>  Links:
>>> ------
>>> [1] tel:937-552-2340 [2]
>>> [2] tel:937-552-2343 [3]
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://www.ics-il.com
>> [2] tel:937-552-2340
>> [3] tel:937-552-2343
>>
>

Reply via email to