How about this: what tests would you like to see done? Overall throughput? Bits/hz? Max tx power per channel/band? Max number of clients for PtMP radio? (Given at least 4 or 10Mbps/sub) Overall Mbps/$?
Name the criteria, and let's get people to do more tests. On April 18, 2015 2:55:41 PM AKDT, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >If your criterion is performance in the presence of a signal on a >different frequency 30 dB stronger than the desired signal, this >analysis is relevant. Also, this seems to be the scenario airPrism is >designed to address. But how often would this occur? Even if the >interference is from another non-synced transmitter on the same tower, >you’d think directional antennas would knock the interfering signal >down to less than 1000 times the desired signal. > >I guess this could be realistic if you have a point to point link in >the same band as a sector, so that a giant dish at the other end is >pointed right at your sector. > > >From: Josh Reynolds >Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2015 5:34 PM >To: af@afmug.com ; Seth Mattinen >Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Very interesting post.. > >Horseshit, read the article. Did you miss the portion where Jim said >"it's the exact same chip that's in the RM5"? > >I would have liked to have seen the RM5 in this test as a baseline, but >ignoring the results simply because it's N tech in the EPMP is silly. >Not only does the throughput drop, but the LEVEL it degrades at is only >"bested" by the B5C in a few of the tests. N or not, that's a very poor >result. > >I would love to see other tests posted on this from other people, its >always nice to have multiple sources to remove any potential level of >bias. > >Jim did an excellent job on this and should be commended. > > >On April 18, 2015 2:26:50 PM AKDT, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> >wrote: >On 4/18/15 2:49 PM, Peter Kranz wrote: Very interesting shootout >comparing AF5X, AC-Lite, AC PTP, EPMP-1000, B5c and RB922 >https://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-Stories/Radio-Shootout-Pt-2-let-s-try-a-whole-bunch-of-them/cns-p/1232309Dude >didn't seem to catch that the ePMP is an N radio and dismisses it as >worst of the worst. Looks to me like it would probably hold up >comparably to its AC counterparts if you take that into >consideration.~Seth >-- >Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
