On 4/18/15 3:34 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Horseshit, read the article. Did you miss the portion where Jim said
"it's the exact same chip that's in the RM5"?
I would have liked to have seen the RM5 in this test as a baseline, but
ignoring the results simply because it's N tech in the EPMP is silly.
Not only does the throughput drop, but the LEVEL it degrades at is only
"bested" by the B5C in a few of the tests. N or not, that's a very poor
result.
I would love to see other tests posted on this from other people, its
always nice to have multiple sources to remove any potential level of bias.
Jim did an excellent job on this and should be commended.
I read it and that's how it came across to me. There shouldn't be any
"surprise" about the ePMP throughput compared across the board. The only
surprise I see is how the Mimosa compared. But I have no horse in this race.
~Seth
