That's a very good point, regardless of what some customers seem to think, mbps really isn't the most important thing...
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns on > PTMP, well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, > consistency, and reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* of > the wifi stuff. This seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is > better than a Fiesta. > </smug> > > One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*) > > Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub" > (*) > > (*) under the right conditions > > Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important. > > Josh Reynolds > CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com > > On 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: > > But no sync. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Peter Kranz > *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC > > > > AC blows doors on ePMP > > > > > *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC > > > > I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's > thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC > gear doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near > future. > > > > -Jason > > > >