The various TDMA or other proprietary protocols generally handle the jitter and
packet loss issues.
I'm not as crazy about TDMA over Nstreme though. NV2 and Airmax both tend to
lose packets and still show high % CCQ. It isn't noticeable over TCP, but I see
it in UDP traffic.
Shame MT can't get their FCC certs straight.
----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Moffett
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
I've always considered mbps to be among the least important concerns on PTMP,
well below packet loss, jitter, QoS features, manageability, consistency, and
reliability. Which is why I'm not super keen on *any* of the wifi stuff. This
seems is like an argument about whether a Pinto is better than a Fiesta.
</smug>
One could say "I can sync but I can only get 60 Mbps per sub" (*)
Another person could say "I can't sync but I can get 200+ Mbps per sub" (*)
(*) under the right conditions
Your market and deployment strats will dictate which is more important.
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.comOn 05/15/2015 04:56 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote:
But no sync.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Peter Kranz
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 3:12 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
AC blows doors on ePMP
Peter Kranz
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-0000
pkr...@unwiredltd.com
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:21 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP vs Ubiquiti AC
I know this isn't an apples to apples comparison, but what are other's
thoughts on these two products? I'm looking at 5GHz, and I know the AC gear
doesn't have the lower 5GHz bands - hopefully they will in the near future.
-Jason
