According to this:
http://www.wordplace.com/ap/
it was P-Edit, for Program Editor. Developed at BYU. Probably why you
remember it.
From: Chuck McCown
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 12:54 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
No, it was a nice editor that later became WordPerfect.
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 11:50 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
pico?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
nano is the only one I can remember the name of when I have to edit cfgs in
linux systems. Very rare for me to have to do that.
I was a big pedit guy back in the day. (or was it p-edit or p edit, I think
it was pedit or pe)
From: Lewis Bergman
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 10:54 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
First I'll say this is one of those theological type discussions. But since I
am sitting in a place swamped by rain and some hail, why not?
I think nano is great if you don't use CLI much since you can figure it out
fast. To me vim is better if you use CLI all the time and edit a lot. Just the
number of syntax highlighters is worth the effort. Very quick to do a great
amount of editing as others mentioned.
But again, if all you do is get in and change one little thing, go nano.
On May 25, 2015 11:21 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
Me thinks you don't know the meaning of suffering. I have used text editors
that go way back. Vi is among the best that I've used.
I've used nano a little bit, and it's functional, but not as useful or
quick as vi.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 5/25/2015 9:04 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I know how to use it, I'm just not a masochist.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Bill Prince" mailto:part15...@gmail.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 11:01:52 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
That's a matter of opinion. Invest a small amount of time with vi (or
vim), and it becomes a great "works anywhere" text editor.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 5/25/2015 8:07 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Nano is infinitely easier to use than vi.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 10:03:38 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
Please don't be serious =(
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
Nano here.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 12:55:43 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
Bah.. vi works fine.
On 5/24/2015 12:45 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
we built ours on webmin. I like webmin. If you have clients with
DNS, you can use views to let them manage their own.
I would guess if you did enough DNS to become intimate with the
CLI, it would be much better, but if you do very little, like us, then webmin
is easy. We ended up doing webmin for all our Linux servers so we can manage
all the updates and whatnot from one central point. Probably not ideal for
linux people. but for us its perfect. Just build a base VM and everytime you
need a new purpose server just copy it and go
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Stefan Englhardt
<s...@genias.net> wrote:
We use powerdns/mysql as authorative ns. And feed it from our
customer db with scripts. Customer db is mysql feeded by a access frontend.
With access it is very easy to build a frontend. You might connect to the
powerdns database directly with access/odbc.
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: "Cassidy B. Larson" <c...@infowest.com>
Datum: 24.05.2015 00:46 (GMT+01:00)
An: af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
We run a PowerDNS master and have our public authoritative BINDs
pull everything as slaves from the private PowerDNS master.
Our zones are kept in a MySQL database for PowerDNS.
PowerDNS has a couple of web editors, this one looks simple and
probably does the job: http://www.powerdns-gui.org/
I think I’ll probably install it and play around as I’m sick of
editing zones in the database by hand :)
Not sure if that helps, but it could be a solution if you want to
go that route.
-c
On May 23, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Any suggestions for this?
I'm tired of having to SSH in and type things out. I'd love to
have something that makes adding zones less painful and more pretty. There's
just too big of a list to make a good decision...
http://www.debianadmin.com/bind-dns-server-web-interfacefrontend-or-gui-tools.html
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
