Now I am stuck reading the book... From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 5:03 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND
According to this: http://www.wordplace.com/ap/ it was P-Edit, for Program Editor. Developed at BYU. Probably why you remember it. From: Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 12:54 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND No, it was a nice editor that later became WordPerfect. From: Josh Luthman Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 11:50 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND pico? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: nano is the only one I can remember the name of when I have to edit cfgs in linux systems. Very rare for me to have to do that. I was a big pedit guy back in the day. (or was it p-edit or p edit, I think it was pedit or pe) From: Lewis Bergman Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 10:54 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND First I'll say this is one of those theological type discussions. But since I am sitting in a place swamped by rain and some hail, why not? I think nano is great if you don't use CLI much since you can figure it out fast. To me vim is better if you use CLI all the time and edit a lot. Just the number of syntax highlighters is worth the effort. Very quick to do a great amount of editing as others mentioned. But again, if all you do is get in and change one little thing, go nano. On May 25, 2015 11:21 AM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote: Me thinks you don't know the meaning of suffering. I have used text editors that go way back. Vi is among the best that I've used. I've used nano a little bit, and it's functional, but not as useful or quick as vi. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 5/25/2015 9:04 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: I know how to use it, I'm just not a masochist. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Bill Prince" mailto:part15...@gmail.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 11:01:52 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND That's a matter of opinion. Invest a small amount of time with vi (or vim), and it becomes a great "works anywhere" text editor. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 5/25/2015 8:07 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Nano is infinitely easier to use than vi. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: "Josh Luthman" mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 10:03:38 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND Please don't be serious =( Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 9:30 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: Nano here. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 12:55:43 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND Bah.. vi works fine. On 5/24/2015 12:45 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: we built ours on webmin. I like webmin. If you have clients with DNS, you can use views to let them manage their own. I would guess if you did enough DNS to become intimate with the CLI, it would be much better, but if you do very little, like us, then webmin is easy. We ended up doing webmin for all our Linux servers so we can manage all the updates and whatnot from one central point. Probably not ideal for linux people. but for us its perfect. Just build a base VM and everytime you need a new purpose server just copy it and go On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: We use powerdns/mysql as authorative ns. And feed it from our customer db with scripts. Customer db is mysql feeded by a access frontend. With access it is very easy to build a frontend. You might connect to the powerdns database directly with access/odbc. -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- Von: "Cassidy B. Larson" <c...@infowest.com> Datum: 24.05.2015 00:46 (GMT+01:00) An: af@afmug.com Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Web interfaces for BIND We run a PowerDNS master and have our public authoritative BINDs pull everything as slaves from the private PowerDNS master. Our zones are kept in a MySQL database for PowerDNS. PowerDNS has a couple of web editors, this one looks simple and probably does the job: http://www.powerdns-gui.org/ I think I’ll probably install it and play around as I’m sick of editing zones in the database by hand :) Not sure if that helps, but it could be a solution if you want to go that route. -c On May 23, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: Any suggestions for this? I'm tired of having to SSH in and type things out. I'd love to have something that makes adding zones less painful and more pretty. There's just too big of a list to make a good decision... http://www.debianadmin.com/bind-dns-server-web-interfacefrontend-or-gui-tools.html Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.