Oh, and I use vitelity's fax service which is very good.   Inbound faxes
come to my email, outbound I just upload a pdf to vitelity. I think they
also have some software to make this easier on a pc.   For paper faxing, I
just use wand scanner and softi scan software to make a pdf.

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, 9:45 AM James Howard <ja...@litewire.net> wrote:

> A friend who used to be a customer back in our IT consulting days asked me
> for a recommendation for hosted PBX.  They are outside of our service area
> and have Charter Business internet.  He isn’t using Charter’s phone service
> because they told him that they couldn’t do DID to each of the phones in
> the office.  Told him they’d have to have all calls coming to the front
> desk and distributed from there.  They have a lot of calls directed to
> their main number that goes to the reception desk but then distribute them
> to the extensions.  They have 8 DID numbers and probably 8 extensions.  He
> said they bought Fortinet phones are using those with Vitelity’s hosted PBX
> service.  He asked me for a recommendation of a better provider than
> Vitelity.  They are constantly hearing that people are getting “the number
> you have dialed is no longer in service” when trying to call them.  We do
> our own in house PBX but don’t resell so I’m not familiar with who the
> better hosted PBX providers are.  He doesn’t have anyone onsite who can
> manage it, needs the provider to set everything up for him.  He also has a
> fax line still but was told by Vitelity that they couldn’t provide that for
> him.  He said he’ll stick with that through the phone company if he has to
> but would be willing to try it through VoIP as long as they can connect it
> to their fax machine.  I think they’ve switched to mostly scan/email of
> documents but are an insurance agency and still feel they need the fax
> ability.
>
>
>
> So, who’s a good provider to point him to that will be better quality than
> Vitelity?  I heard a lot of call quality issues when I was talking to him
> and he’d like to eliminate some of that if he could.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> James Howard
>
> LiteWire Internet Services, Inc.
>
>
>

Reply via email to