You seem to have a lot of issues with radios that won't link up. ;-)
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56:12 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links EPTP mode fills the latency fix. My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path issue or bad radio. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" < geo...@cbcast.com > wrote: Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap PTP with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs, not PTP) operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link with Laird 2' dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than some oddities like intermittent increases in latency, they have all been working very well. Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't want to touch them because they're working just fine. I'm leaning towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever antennas required for new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and ePMP stuff (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can do FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed. On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: <blockquote> Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" < bwireless...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go up on the tower On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > wrote: <blockquote> Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" < lewis.berg...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> Does the force auto select a clean frequency? On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" < mhoward...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container. On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince < part15...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> You mean connectorized? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: <blockquote> The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote> </blockquote>
