Support files said the slave heard the master at -66. Doubt it.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 11, 2015 8:13 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
> New EIRP rules biting you in the ass?
>
> *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
>
>
> EPTP mode fills the latency fix.
>
> My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to
> replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path issue or
> bad radio.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>
>> Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap PTP
>> with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs, not PTP)
>> operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link with Laird 2'
>> dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than some oddities like
>> intermittent increases in latency, they have all been working very well.
>> Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't want to touch them because they're
>> working just fine. I'm leaning towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever
>> antennas required for new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and
>> ePMP stuff (power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can
>> do FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed.
>>
>> On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>> On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" <bwireless...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go up
>>> on the tower
>>> On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure.
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>> On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does the force auto select a clean frequency?
>>>>> On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from
>>>>>> walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You mean connectorized?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
