Dev build ;)
On 2015-06-11 10:38 pm, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
now running at over 100MBps on a 10MHz channel... ???
Is that Air rate you are quoting ?
256QAM on a 10meg channel falls short of 100MBps ...
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected]
-------------------------
FROM: "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]>
TO: [email protected]
SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 8:42:24 PM
SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
Ours replaced RM5's that wouldn't even link... now running at over
100MBps on a 10MHz channel...
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com [1]
On 06/11/2015 04:02 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
No it's just the Af5x...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 11, 2015 7:57 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:
You seem to have a lot of issues with radios that won't link up. ;-)
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com [2]
[3] [4] [5] [6]
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com [7]
[8] [9] [10]
-------------------------
FROM: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
TO: [email protected]
SENT: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:56:12 PM
SUBJECT: Re: [AFMUG] Force110 PTP links
EPTP mode fills the latency fix.
My first attempt at AF5x and it won't even register. I'm trying to
replace Rockets that link up at -66. I'm told that there's a path
issue or bad radio.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 11, 2015 7:45 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:
Why exactly? Just asking. I'm wondering if we should be doing cheap
PTP with ePMP or AF5x. I have several Force110 links up (just SMs,
not PTP) operating all across the 5GHz bands. And one 10 mile link
with Laird 2' dishes using connectorized non-GPS radios. Other than
some oddities like intermittent increases in latency, they have all
been working very well. Most are still running 2.3.3 and I don't
want to touch them because they're working just fine. I'm leaning
towards the Force110 PTP radios and whatever antennas required for
new links since it fits with all the other Canopy and ePMP stuff
(power injection, etc). But the AFs sure are nice when you can do
FDD (except the 5X!) and get very low latency like licensed.
On 6/11/2015 6:32 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Honestly I think they're better than AF5x at this point.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 11, 2015 7:25 PM, "joseph marsh" <[email protected]>
wrote:
I got 2 links ready to deploy just sitting the office waiting to go
up on the tower
On Jun 11, 2015 5:34 PM, "Josh Luthman"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Uhm...I guess? It hears noise better than Ubnt for sure.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 [11]
Direct: 937-552-2343 [12]
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jun 11, 2015 6:23 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Does the force auto select a clean frequency?
On Jun 11, 2015 5:13 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
wrote:
containerized... that must be when you buy a cheap router from
walmart in put it on a tower in a rubbermaid container.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]>
wrote:
You mean connectorized?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 6/11/2015 2:21 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
The containerized 5 GHz radios do the same throughput
Links:
------
[1] http://www.spitwspots.com
[2] http://www.ics-il.com
[3] https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL
[4] https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb
[5] https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions
[6] https://twitter.com/ICSIL
[7] http://www.midwest-ix.com
[8] https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix
[9] https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange
[10] https://twitter.com/mdwestix
[11] tel:937-552-2340
[12] tel:937-552-2343
--
josh reynolds :: chief information officer
spitwspots :: www.spitwspots.com
