RSRP, it is a measurement. It is a truer number than RSSI, which is only an 
estimate (so I'm told). As Ken said, basically add 30 to get an idea of the 
RSSI value.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID
On Jun 13, 2015 5:36 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah... something like that. Notice that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like the 
numbers we're all used to.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof 
<af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because they were 
“per subcarrier” or something?

From: Colin Stanners<mailto:cstann...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here?

Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I can't 
see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable channel 
bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less those.

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary 
<patrick.le...@telrad.com<mailto:patrick.le...@telrad.com>> wrote:

Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let me know 
Chuck.

[cid:0E2DE6CC4411406C902C6E13D144BBDF@khohhofVAIO]



-----Original Message-----
From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org> 
[mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org<mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org>] On Behalf Of 
Steve Discher
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM
To: tel...@wispa.org<mailto:tel...@wispa.org>
Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story



Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results.







************************************************************************************

This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.

************************************************************************************










************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************






************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer 
viruses.
************************************************************************************



Reply via email to