How does LTE penetrate hills? This is the second or third "through a hill" story in the last week?
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com> wrote: > RSRP, it is a measurement. It is a truer number than RSSI, which is only > an estimate (so I'm told). As Ken said, basically add 30 to get an idea of > the RSSI value. > > *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID* > On Jun 13, 2015 5:36 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah... something like that. Notice that is -108 CINR, not RSSI, like > the numbers we're all used to. > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: > >> I think Patrick said to add 30 dB to Telrad signal numbers because >> they were “per subcarrier” or something? >> >> *From:* Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, June 13, 2015 4:17 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Do you want to see this stuff here? >> >> Patrick, I haven't been following Telrad but that's too incredible - I >> can't see how -108, which is below the noise floor for any reasonable >> channel bandwidth (20mhz+?) could get any reasonable speed, much less >> those. >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Patrick Leary <patrick.le...@telrad.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Should I resist sharing this sort of thing? If it's out of line, let >>> me know Chuck. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: telrad-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:telrad-boun...@wispa.org] On >>> Behalf Of Steve Discher >>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:51 PM >>> To: tel...@wispa.org >>> Subject: [Telrad] Another Telrad success story >>> >>> >>> >>> Not to flood the list with these but Zirkel is having great results. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ************************************************************************************ >>> >>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer >>> viruses. >>> >>> >>> ************************************************************************************ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ************************************************************************************ >>> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by >>> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & >>> computer viruses. >>> >>> ************************************************************************************ >>> >>> >> > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by > PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer > viruses. > > ************************************************************************************ > >
