Yeaaaahhhh, meaning $10k per POP? No thanks.
I’m looking at real simple MPLS VPLS implementation. I think Mikrotik can handle that? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT make yourself a favor and move into a carrier class mpls platform... On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net<mailto:sterl...@avative.net>> wrote: Heading the MPLS direction soon, what version was the problem, and what specifically was the problem? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 6:59 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT Again I shoot into my knee with trying to solve a problem with an update. Just introduced a MPLS Problem which was hard to find and vanished after downgrade. Love there attitude toward Quality Control.
