Oh, forgot to mention, you actually see more of the DC versions on eBay than AC.

From: Ken Hohhof 
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 12:07 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT

I’m assuming a used 7301 would work for a site on a backhaul ring for a lot 
less than $10K.  (2 backhaul ports, one local port.)  Not sure if that’s the 
type of thing Gino is talking about.  I believe the 7301 was predecessor to the 
ASR1001 and they probably have something else now for the metro Ethernet market 
and yeah you could spend $10K on those.  But a used 7301 is more like $400.

From: Sterling Jacobson 
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:56 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT

Yeaaaahhhh, meaning $10k per POP?

 

No thanks.

 

I’m looking at real simple MPLS VPLS implementation.

 

I think Mikrotik can handle that?

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT

 

make yourself a favor and move into a carrier class mpls platform... 

 

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> wrote:

  Heading the MPLS direction soon, what version was the problem, and what 
specifically was the problem?

   

   

  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
  Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 6:59 AM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT

   

  Again I shoot into my knee with trying to solve a problem with an update.

  Just introduced a MPLS Problem which was hard to find and vanished

  after downgrade.

  Love there attitude toward Quality Control.

   

 

Reply via email to