Oh, forgot to mention, you actually see more of the DC versions on eBay than AC.
From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 12:07 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT I’m assuming a used 7301 would work for a site on a backhaul ring for a lot less than $10K. (2 backhaul ports, one local port.) Not sure if that’s the type of thing Gino is talking about. I believe the 7301 was predecessor to the ASR1001 and they probably have something else now for the metro Ethernet market and yeah you could spend $10K on those. But a used 7301 is more like $400. From: Sterling Jacobson Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:56 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT Yeaaaahhhh, meaning $10k per POP? No thanks. I’m looking at real simple MPLS VPLS implementation. I think Mikrotik can handle that? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:34 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT make yourself a favor and move into a carrier class mpls platform... On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> wrote: Heading the MPLS direction soon, what version was the problem, and what specifically was the problem? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 6:59 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT Again I shoot into my knee with trying to solve a problem with an update. Just introduced a MPLS Problem which was hard to find and vanished after downgrade. Love there attitude toward Quality Control.
