You can get this with MT?
> On Jul 2, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> wrote: > > 10Gig SFP+ ports? > > Preferably a couple of QSFP 40Gbps ports. > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:07 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT > > I’m assuming a used 7301 would work for a site on a backhaul ring for a lot > less than $10K. (2 backhaul ports, one local port.) Not sure if that’s the > type of thing Gino is talking about. I believe the 7301 was predecessor to > the ASR1001 and they probably have something else now for the metro Ethernet > market and yeah you could spend $10K on those. But a used 7301 is more like > $400. > > From: Sterling Jacobson > Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:56 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT > > Yeaaaahhhh, meaning $10k per POP? > > No thanks. > > I’m looking at real simple MPLS VPLS implementation. > > I think Mikrotik can handle that? > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:34 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT > > make yourself a favor and move into a carrier class mpls platform... > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> > wrote: > Heading the MPLS direction soon, what version was the problem, and what > specifically was the problem? > > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2015 6:59 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT > > Again I shoot into my knee with trying to solve a problem with an update. > Just introduced a MPLS Problem which was hard to find and vanished > after downgrade. > Love there attitude toward Quality Control. > >
