Sterling, 40 Gbps has not been widely adopted for MetroE... most are jumping to 100GE... you have been spoiled by the Dell s4810 Switches... but they lack Metro and Carrier Ethernet features..
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yep! Telco systems its working great! great boxes, great pricing! > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> Telco Systems is his flavor of the day. It was about $1k/box when I >> looked into it. Bigger boxes were more, but that was a standard tower box, >> IIRC. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Thursday, July 2, 2015 12:22:29 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT >> >> Oh, I forgot you were doing fiber. I don’t need 10Gbps much less >> 40Gbps at any of my towers. >> >> I guess we’ll have to wait for Gino to post what he had in mind for >> “carrier class”. >> >> *From:* Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 12:17 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT >> >> >> 10Gig SFP+ ports? >> >> >> >> Preferably a couple of QSFP 40Gbps ports. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 2, 2015 11:07 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT >> >> >> >> I’m assuming a used 7301 would work for a site on a backhaul ring for a >> lot less than $10K. (2 backhaul ports, one local port.) Not sure if >> that’s the type of thing Gino is talking about. I believe the 7301 was >> predecessor to the ASR1001 and they probably have something else now for >> the metro Ethernet market and yeah you could spend $10K on those. But a >> used 7301 is more like $400. >> >> >> >> *From:* Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:56 AM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT >> >> >> >> Yeaaaahhhh, meaning $10k per POP? >> >> >> >> No thanks. >> >> >> >> I’m looking at real simple MPLS VPLS implementation. >> >> >> >> I think Mikrotik can handle that? >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On >> Behalf Of *Gino Villarini >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 2, 2015 10:34 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT >> >> >> >> make yourself a favor and move into a carrier class mpls platform... >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> >> wrote: >> >> Heading the MPLS direction soon, what version was the problem, and what >> specifically was the problem? >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Stefan Englhardt >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 2, 2015 6:59 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik PIT >> >> >> >> Again I shoot into my knee with trying to solve a problem with an update. >> >> Just introduced a MPLS Problem which was hard to find and vanished >> >> after downgrade. >> >> Love there attitude toward Quality Control. >> >> >> >> >> >> >
