I don't think there is a bottom. Maybe some went up, but most are going down 
and are still going down. Everyone I talk to is cheaper than they were last 
time I talked to them (not just HE and Cogent). The labor isn't any cheaper, 
but all of the materials\equipment are and they do more. 

Also, more people are getting more into peering, further reducing their costs. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 3:22:36 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 



Maybe .. but (just my opinion) where is rock bottom? Out with the old and in 
with the new … the old was cheaper to run but you need the new for capacity. 
It’s a never ending circle as we know but the raw cost to push the bits doesn’t 
really come down that much so how can it go much lower – all from the 
perspective of an IP Transit provider. 

I’ve seen several transit providers actually raise their prices in the last 
couple of years a small amount as they realized that “holy crap, we need to 
start making money at this”. One company I worked with not too long ago told me 
that when they sell a 10G port (with 10G commit) that they bank on their 
customers not using more than 30% of the actual pipe – if all their customers 
utilize 70% of the pipe during peak times then they lose money for the first 2 
years of a 3 year contract. That’s not an ideal business model .. BTW, their 
average peak usage on that product in all markets was 68% I was told. 



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 10:48 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 


It'll go down. It always goes down. With 40GigE and 100GigE being available at 
the cost of 10GigE 10 - 15 years ago, it won't be long before 40 and 100 are 
commoditized. There's bigger and bigger channels on the way. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 

----- Original Message -----


From: "Paul Stewart" < p...@paulstewart.org > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2015 9:42:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 
Yup …. The market is hitting pretty much as low as it can go in my opinion …. 
There’s still room for a bit of movement but in major core centers I can’t see 
where IP Transit providers can afford to go much lower. There are already 
providers on the market that are running at very very thin returns – should be 
interesting to see how that “pans out” over the next few years. 

I think things are going to land at $0.35-$1.00 for low end to top end 
depending on providers… at least that’s what I’m seeing from our experience 
pretty much 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 9:09 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 



FYI, based on our experience.... at 100G Levels most IP Transit providers are @ 
very similar Monthly MRC. 

And yes, due to limitations of 100g ports on a line card and expensive optics, 
in many cases 10g LAG Groups are less expensive to implement. 



Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 


Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 






From: "Paul Stewart" < p...@paulstewart.org > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 5:04:19 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 


True… and it’s a one time cost … 

Obviously depends on the provider for that monthly pricing – that’s pretty low 
MRC except for HE crap…. When the market is used to minimal setup fees for 
ports though, the 100G stuff still stands out… the linecard(s) are one thing to 
recover but the price of the optics is still stupidly expensive too .. 

The biggest attraction for me has been in “higher traffic” networks when you 
run into limitations on how many members can be in a LAG … so you go from 10G 
LAG’s to 100G LAG’s ;) 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 3:58 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 



Hmmmm, considering a full 100g port of service would be priced at $35,000 to 
$45,000 / Month, it needs a $150,000 to $500,000 Router to handle, a one time 
charge of $30,000 to $100,000 is negotiable and rather an irrelevant figure in 
that picture :) 



Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 


Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 




<blockquote>

From: "Paul Stewart" < p...@paulstewart.org > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 2:09:24 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 


Well there is no question that 10G ports and LAG’s of 10G are more popular but 
the number of 100G ports being sold for IP Transit is definitely picking up 
quite noticeably J The biggest challenge that I have run across is pure 
economics – the cost of the ports makes it hard for them to sell them to 
customers at much discount. The quotes on 100G transit that I have seen 
typically have a $60k-$100k per port setup fee to try and recover a portion of 
costs up front. The attraction is higher in markets where x-connect monthly 
fees are quite high. 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 8:13 AM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 


http://www.telecomramblings.com/2015/07/thursday-bytes-gtt-telepacific-vxchnge-netrality-faction/
 




100G ports to customers still isn't common. It happens, but isn't common. It's 
mostly for internal connections. 






----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 




From: "Paul Stewart" < p...@paulstewart.org > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 5:26:55 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 
Actually to be specific, GTT is a “Tier1” provider since they acquired TiNet. 
So usually a “blend of several networks” refers to a Tier2 provider .. GTT has 
* many * direct peers of significant size J 

Long time customer of the various companies that came part of the GTT 
“umbrella” – overall pretty happy although I’ve heard second hand about lots of 
“reorganization” problems .. haven’t seen much of it first hand though. 

100 Gig very common now in most areas.. maybe there were the first to deploy in 
Saudi or something… 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Justin Wilson - MTIN 
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 9:16 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 

We use them in Chicago. They provide a BGP blend of several networks. They are 
an international provider. One of their direct peers is China Telecom. I saw a 
press release they are doing 100 Gig in Saudi Arabia. If you want to know about 
our experiences with them (pretty good for the most part) hit me offlist. 




Justin 








--- 

Justin Wilson < j...@mtin.net > 
http://www.mtin.net Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers 
http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics 
http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange 


<blockquote>


On Jul 8, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: 




As in GTT – IP Transit provider? 





From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway 
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 1:47 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: [AFMUG] Anyone heard of GTT 



I was told they are pulling out of Tucson. 



Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 

4226 S. 37 th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 

602-426-0542 

r...@triadwireless.net 

www.triadwireless.net 



“Nothing can bring you peace but yourself. Nothing can bring you peace but the 
triumph of principles.” – Ralph Waldo Emerson 





http://t.signauxdeux.com/e1t/o/5/f18dQhb0S1Ll8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrW7sKj5C56dQtgf3ZlND602?si=5679648505069568&pi=5135D234-DD8D-4602-8F2A-9491AF24D5F7

</blockquote>



</blockquote>




Reply via email to