On 7/12/15 17:50, Paul Stewart wrote:
Peering cheaper for people … sure .. at certain traffic levels it’s almost worthwhile. Don’t get me wrong – I’m a big proponent of peering. But the “breakeven” point where it makes sense to scale up peering efforts isn’t what it used to be. Having said that, costs savings are not the only reason people peer as some of us realize .. there’s other advantages in my opinion as well.
I don't really mention cost savings as a reason for peering anymore. I typically go for the efficiency, diversity, regional/local traffic angle.
~Seth
