The answer you are looking for is 802.11ac?
Anyway, I guess I’m mistaken and 220M may be the right number for 256QAM in 40
MHz. Assuming the planets align and every sub is at max modulation with no
retries.
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
And Mimosa is...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 2:19 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
Really, 220 Mbps in a 40 MHz channel? That’s a bunch for something based on
an 802.11n PHY.
I think the regular Force 110 spec sheet says 150M, does the GPS sync version
really say 220M? I’m not disputing it, just surprised/amazed.
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:15 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP force 110 gps sync
220 would be perfect. I've had nothing but great RF performance. Did you
see my story about going from Beams to force110?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jul 21, 2015 1:51 PM, "Joshua Heide" <j...@velociter.net> wrote:
Looking into these units. Wondering what kind of throughput people are
getting with these. Are you getting the 220mbps real world throughput that they
claim?
Josh Heide
Network Engineer
Velociter Wireless, Inc.
(209)838-1221 x108
