Yep... See http://tickets.packetflux.com/kb/faq.php?id=14
If you have these on the bench, I'd upgrade them before you put them in the field. If they're in the field, and you have to go out to get them detected, I'd wait for another week or so until I release the next syncinjector firmware. The firmware releases for the injector are at the top of my list. Well, top of my list right behind getting a couple of circuit board layouts done (which are basically 'send off and then wait for 2 weeks before you do anything else for that product). -forrest On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:02 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > It sounds like you're having the module detection issue on the expansion > bus. Forrest put out some new firmware that fixes those issues. > > I also recall that there was a wiring/pinout change with the newer > SyncInjectors. Or maybe the GPS data issue is because the Rev E pipes don't > do NMEA format? > > On 7/23/2015 12:29 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > Forrest? > I have a revision E0 Parasitic > Base Unit II - Firmware - March 12 2013 > SyncInjector100RevH1 22-Jan-14 > SyncInjector430RevH1 12-Jan-15 > > The 100 injector will not show connected unless it is the first device, > it was doing some weird stuff like randomly not being connected, but I > think it may have been due to the amount if time I left power off when > cycling > > I have the parasitic connected to the syncinjector 100, its is getting > pulses and both the fsk and the 320 AP are showing sync, but there is no > GPS data. Is this normal behavior when using a parasitic? > > Parasitics dont generate their own sync, is this correct? So if it is > sending pulses, even without the satellite info they should be valid timing? > > I though when I shop tested these that they were showing GPS data, but I > dont know if I tested with this particular parasitic > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:21 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The link Josh posted to wire the RJ12 to RJ45 jumper will allow you to >> use the spare parasitics with SyncInjectors. But I think you need at least >> Rev E or possibly Rev F/G/H pipes with the newer SiteMonitor controlled >> SyncInjectors. There's some difference, I forget what it is. I think the >> no-no was Rev C pipes on Rev H SyncInjectors. Forrest would have to say for >> sure what works with what. >> >> On 6/19/2015 12:18 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >> >> We have always used the parasitics, syncsplitters, creative taps and >> syncbox, but these syncinjectors are the bees knees, other than that they >> arent universal. BUT, not having to climb up makes a huge difference, and >> being able to do with packetflux with a handful of hundred dollar bills >> what the CMMs do, its a no brainer. but now we have a bunch of parasitics >> laying around. They just wont die, so we have to use them >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:19 AM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, I have a couple sites with either a SyncPipe Deluxe or a SyncBox >>> on top powered separately and a SyncInjector with it's own Basic pipe at >>> the bottom to provide redundant timing to some 450 sectors. >>> >>> I also have some 450 sectors each with their own Parasitic pipes because >>> they're far apart on the tower. And I get some strange GPS issues there >>> when it rains or there's heavy cloud cover. So I asked Forrest if it would >>> be OK to put a sync over power pulse through the Parasitic pipes. He said >>> no issues and I've bench tested it, so I'm going to add a SyncInjector on >>> those APs >>> >>> On 6/19/2015 11:06 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>> >>> I have mostly switched to using the Syncbox12 instead of Parasitics. >>> It does have a Syncinjector port on it (which I haven’t had a use for). >>> >>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Friday, June 19, 2015 10:48 AM >>> *To:* <[email protected]>[email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 24v syncinjector wiring >>> >>> 1. From what I'm told you can do it. Just reverse the blue/brown >>> pairs. Sync pulse doesn't cause damage from what Forrest said. >>> >>> 2. >>> <http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector> >>> http://manuals.packetflux.com/index.php?page=using-a-syncpipe-parasitic-with-a-syncinjector >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:45 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I thought I had read these are both doable, >>>> 1. Can I power ubnt devices off these? what is the cross pinout? and do >>>> I need to turn off the sync pulse on that port? >>>> >>>> 2. Can I use a syncpipe parasitic on the syncinjector? Isnt there a >>>> particular cable pinout to do this? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your > team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > -- *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.* Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 [email protected] | http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>
