The problem when I do mail in a FIFO manner....
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 7/24/2015 11:36 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
You missed my post 10 seconds later when the lightbulb went on ;)
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Bill Prince
*Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 2:03 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
Seriously?!?!
There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.
That's a really old one.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 7/24/2015 7:27 AM, Paul Stewart wrote:
Google translator comes up empty on that one J
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Shayne Lebrun
*Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 10:16 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
TANSTAAFL.
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Paul Stewart
*Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 9:32 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
I understand what you’re saying … yes, people (like myself)
complaining about something free … totally understand that part.
But many times when a vendor brings in something major and new, it
often causes problems with code on routers/switches that has
worked perfectly fine for a long time. To bring DPI into any
router involves a significant amount of codebase change very low
on the IP stack .. a lot can go wrong…
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Brett A
Mansfield
*Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 9:06 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
I had/have that concern as well. But it is mind boggling to me
that so many people are complaining about ubiquiti putting in this
value added feature (quite well I may add). I have never seen so
many complaints about features being added. Shouldn't we instead
complain about the needed features their products are missing?
Complaining about ubiquiti adding in DPI, even if it sucked, is
like complaining that you get a dozen free games when you buy an
XBox One. You may not like the games you get, but they are free
and you don't have to play them if you don't want.
Thank you,
Brett A Mansfield
On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:52 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I think the thought is that DPI is a very intensive process
and if the router wasn't designed with enormous overhead or
hardware acceleration, it could be crippling. Maybe those
routers were...
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Brett A Mansfield" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Friday, July 24, 2015 7:50:02 AM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
I don't know why anyone would have a problem with them putting
this on existing routers. If you don't like their routers,
don't buy them. If you do like their routers but think a
feature shouldn't be there, don't enable it.
I think it's great that ubiquiti innovates the way they do.
They have some great products that blow other products out of
the water in one way or another. And it's forced other
companies to lower their seriously over priced equipment and
to rethink their strategies. Ubiquiti really is disrupting
things in the industry in only good ways.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:17 AM, Paul Stewart
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well it will be interesting … sure would be nice to see
someone “disrupt” I agree … but there have been lots of
folks try to provide “DPI” and fail badly as they didn’t
really understand what they were getting into… and doing
it on existing routers is usually the first mistake in my
opinion…..
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*Jason McKemie
*Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 1:27 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see
someone undercut the existing players.
On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve
seen from companies to stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a
router, then stability and any type of scaling would
be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see
someone like Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion…
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*Jeremy
*Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI?
Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been
announced I'd assume any NDAs have been lifted. Have
any of you been using this? Any idea what type of
latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot
different from any DPI tool that I have ever seen....
