+1 :)
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Brett A Mansfield < li...@silverlakeinternet.com> wrote: > I had/have that concern as well. But it is mind boggling to me that so > many people are complaining about ubiquiti putting in this value added > feature (quite well I may add). I have never seen so many complaints about > features being added. Shouldn't we instead complain about the needed > features their products are missing? > > Complaining about ubiquiti adding in DPI, even if it sucked, is like > complaining that you get a dozen free games when you buy an XBox One. You > may not like the games you get, but they are free and you don't have to > play them if you don't want. > > Thank you, > Brett A Mansfield > > On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:52 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > I think the thought is that DPI is a very intensive process and if the > router wasn't designed with enormous overhead or hardware acceleration, it > could be crippling. Maybe those routers were... > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Brett A Mansfield" <li...@silverlakeinternet.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Friday, July 24, 2015 7:50:02 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > I don't know why anyone would have a problem with them putting this on > existing routers. If you don't like their routers, don't buy them. If you > do like their routers but think a feature shouldn't be there, don't enable > it. > > I think it's great that ubiquiti innovates the way they do. They have some > great products that blow other products out of the water in one way or > another. And it's forced other companies to lower their seriously over > priced equipment and to rethink their strategies. Ubiquiti really is > disrupting things in the industry in only good ways. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jul 24, 2015, at 6:17 AM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > > Well it will be interesting … sure would be nice to see someone “disrupt” > I agree … but there have been lots of folks try to provide “DPI” and fail > badly as they didn’t really understand what they were getting into… and > doing it on existing routers is usually the first mistake in my opinion….. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2015 1:27 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > > > They've got the resources to do it, would be nice to see someone undercut > the existing players. > > On Thursday, July 23, 2015, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > > I have no idea but if it’s like other attempts I’ve seen from companies to > stack heavy CPU “stuff” into a router, then stability and any type of > scaling would be first concerns. DPI is a very complex item to see someone > like Ubiquiti jump into in my opinion… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy > *Sent:* Thursday, July 23, 2015 7:13 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Ubiquiti DPI? > > > > Ok, so now that deep packet inspection has been announced I'd assume any > NDAs have been lifted. Have any of you been using this? Any idea what > type of latency is added? That pricing model is a whole lot different from > any DPI tool that I have ever seen.... > > >
