RB1xxx ? So is this an issue with the 1100 also?
On 8/4/2015 2:01 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The last couple ports on the RB1xxx series... suck. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From: *"Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> *To: *af@afmug.com *Sent: *Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:00:14 PM *Subject: *[AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10 I just read a forum post saying that ports 9&10 on the RB1200 underperform compared to the other ports. Does anyone know how bad that underperformance is? I've been pulling my hair out for days chasing a performance issue on a backhaul, and it turns out one end of it is plugged into port9 on an RB1200. Could it make my 200 meg link only do 90meg?
