It's just killing me because I've been pulling my hair out trying to
find an ethernet or RF problem that isn't there. Grrrrr.
On 8/4/2015 2:54 PM, Gabriel Pike wrote:
The block diagram shows 9 & 10 on PCIe. I have had performance issues
on both of these ports and have pulled most 1200 routers from production.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 04, 2015 2:17 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10
11, 12 and 13 on the 1100 each have dedicated PCIe lanes to the CPU. I
haven't really seen any issues with them, at least on the 1100AHx2. I
have one original 1100 and one 1100AH left in the network and those
aren't doing much. The bigger issue I've seen with the 1100AHx2 is the
fans quit and the whole thing needs a power-cycle to get them going
again. I've seen this on every single one I have deployed.
On 8/4/2015 1:06 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Whichever the last few ports are. Check the block diagrams on
routerboard.com to see which ones are special. It's not EVERYTHING
not ran through a switch chip, but darn near.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:05:09 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10
RB1xxx ? So is this an issue with the 1100 also?
On 8/4/2015 2:01 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The last couple ports on the RB1xxx series... suck.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>
*To: *af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent: *Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:00:14 PM
*Subject: *[AFMUG] RB1200 ports 9&10
I just read a forum post saying that ports 9&10 on the RB1200
underperform compared to the other ports.
Does anyone know how bad that underperformance is? I've been
pulling my
hair out for days chasing a performance issue on a backhaul,
and it
turns out one end of it is plugged into port9 on an RB1200.
Could it make my 200 meg link only do 90meg?
