+1 about. So I assume we'll see about half the current latency with 2.5 msec? I can live with that for most links.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Thanks for the confirmation. And on a Saturday!!! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < > daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > >> 2.5 msec frame allows for sync and improves PTP latency as compared to 5 >> msec frame. >> >> >> >> ePTP cannot be synced as communication is driven based on dynamic data >> from each link. >> >> >> Dan Sullivan >> >> ePMP Software Manager >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >> *Sent:* Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:11 AM >> *To:* af >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> >> >> Yep, I'm pretty sure it doesn't use fixed frames in ePTP mode... trying >> to sync that sounds like it'd end up like airmax sync. >> >> 2.5ms frames make sync a lot more useful for ptp though. >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> wrote: >> >> But that depends on frame timing which would leave you at the current tdd >> ptp (5ms today, 2.5ms after 2.5). I'd love to see the 2ms latency be >> synced but I don't see how that would be doable. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Aug 8, 2015 7:54 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >> No, I mean exactly what I said ePTP sync. >> >> There's no reason that I'm aware of that the ePTP up\down cycles couldn't >> be synced. The regular sync has to deal with potentially dozens of clients. >> The ePTP just has to deal with one. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:48:14 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> Eptp sync doesn't sound possible. That's what the tdd ptp is for. Do >> you mean the 2.5ms timing? >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Aug 8, 2015 7:47 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >> Though* Early in the morning... >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:45:55 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> Is it, thought? ;-) >> >> >> FWIW, I have some ePTP up (eagerly awaiting ePTP sync!) and no issues >> that I'm aware of. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Friday, August 7, 2015 4:41:45 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? >> >> How long has it been up? According to Cambium I'm the only one that's >> been experiencing a bug and it's all over the place. They've got a fix for >> it but it's just so weird that I'm the only one with the problem =/ >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Yep, I just replaced a pair of NanoBridges with Force 110's doing ePTP a >> couple days ago and we have at least one other. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >> wrote: >> >> Anyone at all? >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
