Please see subject line. I would suspect free space loss would be a major factor.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Am I reading that right, 45 MHz for 30 megabit? I know it's a long > distance, but what was the throughput limitation? Signal to noise? What > were the identified noise sources? Local, along the path, remote, etc? > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Ray Savich" <ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.com> > *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:54:36 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PTP 650 Sets New Wireless Broadband Link Record of > 245km > > We were using 3 ft. standard performance dishes from tire-mount masts at > 5.8 GHz. > > Ran the link at 5, 30 and 45 MHz channels and had receive signals of > approximately -76 dBm even while battling some pretty heavy winds. We > were running a high-def video link and a VoIP server over the channel. > Consistently stayed above 30 Mbps which is what we had designed the link > for. The link was established with both PTP 650 and PTP 700. > > The link came up fast and we were testing out the applications after less > than an hour on site. > > > > LINKPlanner does take the curvature of the earth (and altitude) into > consideration. > > > > Join the Conversation > > Cambium Networks Community Forum <http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/> > > > > -- Lewis Bergman 325-439-0533 Cell
