The RF section is way better that the Rocket.  But if you come from the
PTP600/650 world, you have been spoiled.  We have a couple of af5x links,
work well.  One of the downfalls from it is the inability for the slave to
scan all channels for the master, you cant only configure 3 channels for
scan... make its very difficult to troubleshot remote RF problems

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Andreas Wiatowski <
andr...@silowireless.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am wondering if anyone can tell me what you are seeing with the Airfiber
> 5x product from Ubiquiti on a 20Mhz channel in terms of speed.
>
>
>
> We have invested a lot of money into 650’s from Cambium and licenced SAF.
> We have been using the MT QRT product as a cost conscience backhaul as
> well.   I had a lot of bad experiences with the Ubiquiti products in the
> past…but the AF 24 has been solid small hop contender.   My caution, In
> particular, is that we had to use NBMA in order to get OSPF to work
> properly with Rocket M5’s and we found the speeds to be all over the place
> with the product…no consistency.
>
>
>
> Any comments / kudos / considerations???
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> ______________________________
>
> Andreas Wiatowski | CEO
>
> Silo Wireless Inc.
>
> Email  andr...@silowireless.com
>
> 19 Sage Court
>
> Brantford, Ontario N3R 7T4 (CANADA)
>
> Tel +1.519.449.5656  Extension-600|Fax +1.519.449.5536 |Toll Free
> +1.866.727.4138
> Website http://www.silowireless.com/  | Facebook
> http://www.facebook.com/silowireless | Twitter @silowireless
>
> This electronic message and all of its contents and attachments contain
> information from the offices of Silo Wireless Inc., which may be
> privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure.  The
> information is intended to be for the addressee only.  If you are not the
> addressee, then any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this
> message, or its contents or any of its attachments, is prohibited.  If you
> have received this electronic message in error, please notify us
> immediately and destroy the original message and all copies.
>
>
>

Reply via email to