I just got an email from Aaronia. I hadn't looked at their stuff in a while but they have a nice selection of SA tools. I see that they have a GPS attachment for mapping results. Might be worth a look for you.
http://www.aaronia.com/news/ -Ty On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Rob Genovesi <r...@corp.coastside.net> wrote: > If you want to roll your own you can use gpsd (http://www.catb.org/gpsd/) > to pull GPS data. You could collate that with signal info pulled from the > bullet. > > Kismet + gpsd was a popular option "back in the day", however I don't > think the Kismet project has been kept active. > > -Rob > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I have to do a heat map too. Perhaps a bullet would work with an omni, >> but still have to have software to correlate it with the GPS location etc. >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Friday, August 14, 2015 10:14 AM >> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Drive Testing >> >> >> You have a truck and AC DC converter? Small mast and Nano station works >> well. Just stop at key points . remember when I first started testing >> Rocket 900s and I shared pictures of mast with Yagi's and m900 on mast on >> my red Silverado? Some on list even made fun of me. Didn't give a shit >> cause I was able to map out coverage area and get an accurate idea of range >> ,coverage and penetration. I still do surveys that way using NS and >> Bullets with grid antennas. I have a L bracket on my white Silverado for >> that purpose >> On Aug 14, 2015 9:12 AM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >> >>> What is the best way to do drive testing to document AP coverage. I >>> need something that is very automated. I presume the vehicle would have >>> to have an omni but they you would need to adjust the RX signal up by 20 dB >>> to account for the use of a reflector. Would need a 5 GHz receiver or >>> spectrum analyzer that will measure down to –100 dBm I would think. >>> >>> Have never been involved in something like this. I have used SMs for >>> this but they are directional and not automated. >>> >> >
