You could do it....just take thousands of iterations at various elevations. I remember when running Planet, Oddessy, Cellcad, Wizard, Athena, and CE4 back in the day and it taking hours on end just to do a few sites in 2D. I don't think a 3D plot would be done today...LOL.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Brian Webster <[email protected]> wrote: > This is kind of cool. If RF tools actually propagated in 3 dimensions > rather than just two dimensions on a flat map it would be fairly easy to > develop an app like this to visualize in 3D. In fact it might even be > possible to do in Google Earth. To generate 3D propagations would take a > much greater length of time but would be very useful information for many > things. > > > > Thank You, > > Brian Webster > > www.wirelessmapping.com > > www.Broadband-Mapping.com > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ty Featherling > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:42 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] App for Wireless signal visualization? > > > > It's a fictitious rendering of what it might look like, but still that is > wicked cool. One day in my life maybe I will get to see RF Goggles but this > is pretty neat. Apparently it just pulled from databases the locations of > satellites, cell towers, and something else and maps them in 3d kind of > like Google Sky does with planets and stars. It doesn't actively listen for > RF and paint the picture. > > > > -Ty > > > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > http://gizmodo.com/if-our-eyes-could-see-wireless-signals-heres-what-the-1726215792 > > >
