I bet a modern high-end machine (with good software) could do it. Might need to add a Tesla (not the car) to it .
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cameron Crum" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 4:03:06 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] App for Wireless signal visualization? You could do it....just take thousands of iterations at various elevations. I remember when running Planet, Oddessy, Cellcad, Wizard, Athena, and CE4 back in the day and it taking hours on end just to do a few sites in 2D. I don't think a 3D plot would be done today...LOL. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Brian Webster < [email protected] > wrote: This is kind of cool. If RF tools actually propagated in 3 dimensions rather than just two dimensions on a flat map it would be fairly easy to develop an app like this to visualize in 3D. In fact it might even be possible to do in Google Earth. To generate 3D propagations would take a much greater length of time but would be very useful information for many things. Thank You, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadband-Mapping.com From: Af [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Ty Featherling Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] App for Wireless signal visualization? It's a fictitious rendering of what it might look like, but still that is wicked cool. One day in my life maybe I will get to see RF Goggles but this is pretty neat. Apparently it just pulled from databases the locations of satellites, cell towers, and something else and maps them in 3d kind of like Google Sky does with planets and stars. It doesn't actively listen for RF and paint the picture. -Ty On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Gino Villarini < [email protected] > wrote: http://gizmodo.com/if-our-eyes-could-see-wireless-signals-heres-what-the-1726215792
