They definitely do not support IF-MIB.

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:56 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:

> Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts
> graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs.
>
> Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface
> OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit
> to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1.2.1.2 would tell you if the standard
> stuff is there. That's dumb if it's not.
>
> On 9/15/2015 10:36 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>
> half those would never graph: for example
>
> danEthRxTotalBytes
> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html#danEthRxTotalBytes>
>  Object
> ID: 1.3.1.4.1.32584.1.8.13.5
> Total number of bytes received.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Do you want it from the AP
>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html>
>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html
>> Or the CPEs?
>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.Motorola-CPE-PRIVATE-MIB.html
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on
>>> these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the basics rssi, cinr 1
>>> cinr 2 etc. Any ethernet stats would be nice.
>>>
>>> RIght know we have random loss to the subs, im guessing its something to
>>> do with some interference, But it could boil down to a saturated AP, and so
>>> far as I have been able to tell you cant monitor throughput on these trash
>>> cans other than monitoring the ethernet of the connected device
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
>

Reply via email to