No can do. Monitor your swichport instead. On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:46 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about AP > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> SM: >> >> Traffic In: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.3.0 >> Traffic Out: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.2.0 >> >> Pulled straight from Cacti. Works like a champ. >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> They definitely do not support IF-MIB. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:56 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts >>>> graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs. >>>> >>>> Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface >>>> OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit >>>> to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1.2.1.2 would tell you if the standard >>>> stuff is there. That's dumb if it's not. >>>> >>>> On 9/15/2015 10:36 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>> >>>> half those would never graph: for example >>>> >>>> danEthRxTotalBytes >>>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html#danEthRxTotalBytes> >>>> Object >>>> ID: 1.3.1.4.1.32584.1.8.13.5 >>>> Total number of bytes received. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Do you want it from the AP >>>>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html> >>>>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html >>>>> Or the CPEs? >>>>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.Motorola-CPE-PRIVATE-MIB.html >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on >>>>>> these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the basics rssi, cinr 1 >>>>>> cinr 2 etc. Any ethernet stats would be nice. >>>>>> >>>>>> RIght know we have random loss to the subs, im guessing its something >>>>>> to do with some interference, But it could boil down to a saturated AP, >>>>>> and >>>>>> so far as I have been able to tell you cant monitor throughput on these >>>>>> trash cans other than monitoring the ethernet of the connected device >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
