SM:

Traffic In: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.3.0
Traffic Out: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.2.0

Pulled straight from Cacti. Works like a champ.

On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote:

> They definitely do not support IF-MIB.
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:56 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>
>> Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts
>> graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs.
>>
>> Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface
>> OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit
>> to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1.2.1.2 would tell you if the standard
>> stuff is there. That's dumb if it's not.
>>
>> On 9/15/2015 10:36 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>>
>> half those would never graph: for example
>>
>> danEthRxTotalBytes
>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html#danEthRxTotalBytes>
>>  Object
>> ID: 1.3.1.4.1.32584.1.8.13.5
>> Total number of bytes received.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Colin Stanners <cstann...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you want it from the AP
>>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html>
>>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html
>>> Or the CPEs?
>>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.Motorola-CPE-PRIVATE-MIB.html
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on
>>>> these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the basics rssi, cinr 1
>>>> cinr 2 etc. Any ethernet stats would be nice.
>>>>
>>>> RIght know we have random loss to the subs, im guessing its something
>>>> to do with some interference, But it could boil down to a saturated AP, and
>>>> so far as I have been able to tell you cant monitor throughput on these
>>>> trash cans other than monitoring the ethernet of the connected device
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to