Rory have you tried the AC sectors? They seem cleaner that the previous antennas in regards to FB ratio and sidelobes. I did a mass replace of rfarmor sectors with AC sectors and saw improved performance across the board. Their general shielding is structurally similar to the way RF armor works.
Peter Kranz <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> www.UnwiredLtd.com Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 Mobile: 510-207-0000 <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 11:28 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] rfarmor pricing It makes a big difference if you are clustering the antennas on the same pole or tower with Ubiquiti equipment. Even the better antennas don’t have the same level of side and back rejection. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 11:22 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] rfarmor pricing Agreed, it makes more sense to me to just use better antennas in the first place. On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> > wrote: I don’t see the use case for rfarmor at this point. Peter Kranz www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 <tel:510-868-1614%20x100> Mobile: 510-207-0000 <tel:510-207-0000> pkr...@unwiredltd.com <mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 10:59 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] rfarmor pricing is he wanting to go out of business? -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
