I did the same. Replaced several RF armor shielded sectors with the new AC ones and had much better performance. I still think there is a place for RF armor though. They are only 60 degree sectors so I'd have to use twice as many radios killing what, if any spectrum there is left. I use RF armor on all of my rocket dishes and many of my sectors.
Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On Sep 18, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote: > > Rory have you tried the AC sectors? They seem cleaner that the previous > antennas in regards to FB ratio and sidelobes. I did a mass replace of > rfarmor sectors with AC sectors and saw improved performance across the > board. Their general shielding is structurally similar to the way RF armor > works. > > <image002.jpg> > > Peter Kranz > www.UnwiredLtd.com > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 11:28 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] rfarmor pricing > > It makes a big difference if you are clustering the antennas on the same pole > or tower with Ubiquiti equipment. Even the better antennas don’t have the > same level of side and back rejection. > > Rory > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 11:22 AM > To: af > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] rfarmor pricing > > Agreed, it makes more sense to me to just use better antennas in the first > place. > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Peter Kranz <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote: > I don’t see the use case for rfarmor at this point. > > Peter Kranz > www.UnwiredLtd.com > Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 > Mobile: 510-207-0000 > pkr...@unwiredltd.com > > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 10:59 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: [AFMUG] rfarmor pricing > > is he wanting to go out of business? > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
