My house does a little traffic constantly (primarily upstream) and I changed it to SFQ around 2ish. I see no difference in CPU usage - it still parallels with the amount of throughput.
Not sure what the throughput change would be, though. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you look at the docs between pfifo and sfq there is a pretty large > difference from a downstream perspective. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, 10:32 AM Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Saw in the ePMP knowledge base that they recommend changing queue type >> from default to wireless-default. >> >> In one of my mikrotik pppoe servers I look and see default is pfifo >> with 50 packets. Wireless-default is sfq with 5s and 1514bytes. >> >> What would advantages or reason for the change? >> >> I don't user epmp yet but on my PPPoE server I frequently have >> complaints from users that have there upstream maxed out by one thing >> or another complain about there connection. I wander if switching to >> sfq might help there? Or it might simply max my Mikrotik CPUs out. >> >
