The advice may or may not apply. But if your issue is between Ubnt/MT I don't know if I'd take ePMP documentation to be fixing the issue.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Bad advice to assume that if you're not using ePMP then it doesn't apply. > I don't know, but perhaps that's a general best practice that we should be > using across more vendors. Cambium sure isn't going to tell you how to > tweak your UBNT wireless etup. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:35:05 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types > > > Well if you're not using ePMP that documentation really doesn't apply... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Saw in the ePMP knowledge base that they recommend changing queue type >> from default to wireless-default. >> >> In one of my mikrotik pppoe servers I look and see default is pfifo >> with 50 packets. Wireless-default is sfq with 5s and 1514bytes. >> >> What would advantages or reason for the change? >> >> I don't user epmp yet but on my PPPoE server I frequently have >> complaints from users that have there upstream maxed out by one thing >> or another complain about there connection. I wander if switching to >> sfq might help there? Or it might simply max my Mikrotik CPUs out. >> > > >
