It may be something everyone should be doing everywhere, I don't know. It's possible, perhaps even likely that the MT default PPPoE settings aren't optimal.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:41:56 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types The advice may or may not apply. But if your issue is between Ubnt/MT I don't know if I'd take ePMP documentation to be fixing the issue. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: Bad advice to assume that if you're not using ePMP then it doesn't apply. I don't know, but perhaps that's a general best practice that we should be using across more vendors. Cambium sure isn't going to tell you how to tweak your UBNT wireless etup. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Josh Luthman" < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:35:05 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types Well if you're not using ePMP that documentation really doesn't apply... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt < matt.mailingli...@gmail.com > wrote: <blockquote> Saw in the ePMP knowledge base that they recommend changing queue type from default to wireless-default. In one of my mikrotik pppoe servers I look and see default is pfifo with 50 packets. Wireless-default is sfq with 5s and 1514bytes. What would advantages or reason for the change? I don't user epmp yet but on my PPPoE server I frequently have complaints from users that have there upstream maxed out by one thing or another complain about there connection. I wander if switching to sfq might help there? Or it might simply max my Mikrotik CPUs out. </blockquote>
