Hard to get a driver’s license in Germany.

From: Lewis Bergman 
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 3:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

Maybe the simple fact that Germany has a much lower rate of car ownership would 
explain why they allow them more freedom in that area. 809 compared to 588 per 
1000. I would think the lower rate would indicate a more responsible average.




On Sat, Oct 10, 2015, 3:32 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:

  What's right for one country, isn't necessarily right for another. While I 
would love to be able to drive as fast I think is safe, knowing how the typical 
American drives, I'd guess that it would be far more deadly here than in 
Germany. I suspect the same logic applies to other stuff to some extent. 

  On Oct 10, 2015 11:05 AM, "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net> wrote:

    Countrys with weak gun control have more shot people. Simple logic in my 
eyes.

    Nothing to say against if the majority of a country takes this into 
account. Just strange in

    the eyes of a foreign citizen.

    In my country you can buy a BMW and drive as fast as you think it is ok on 
highways.

    this kills, too. Same arguments here. It is the freedom to drive. 





    Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Mike Hammett
    Gesendet: Samstag, 10. Oktober 2015 16:47
    An: af@afmug.com
    Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings



    Except that most mass shootings are done with weapons that were obtained in 
circumstances that even the most strict of control laws would allow. The 
weapons painted as being so evil just plain aren't used in these situations.

    Logic doesn't lead you to gun control.



    -----
    Mike Hammett
    Intelligent Computing Solutions
    http://www.ics-il.com




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: "Darin Steffl" <darin.ste...@mnwifi.com>
    To: af@afmug.com
    Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 8:12:08 AM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

    I carry a .380 pistol with me most of the time but I only own three guns 
myself. I also consider myself to have many Democratic views when it comes to 
gun policy and Republican views with taxes & business aspects.



    I personally think it should be MUCH harder to purchase a firearm than it 
is. When I purchased my new glock, I ordered it online at Gander Mountain and 
walked into the store, they did a quick background check and I walked out in 10 
minutes. It was great to me as a consumer and easy. BUT, what if I was angry or 
in the heat of the moment and wanted to harm people. Now that easy gun purchase 
allowed me to walk out the same day with a deadly weapon.



    I do not think our government is trying to take guns away as the crazy 
Republicans like to lie about. I do think we should have much stricter gun 
control though to keep the nutty people from having easy access. All that is 
going to do is make it take longer to purchase a legal firearm, which I am 
perfectly fine with if it prevents even one shooting death or mass shooting. 



    If there's other policies being proposed that can help limit access to 
guns, I'm all for it if it still allows me to purchase a pistol to carry 
legally and a shotgun to go hunting. I don't believe I should be allowed to own 
a machine gun type weapon for use at my home. Weapons like that should be 
allowed only at shooting ranges and locked up under heavy security. They do not 
belong at a residential home anywhere for sport or home protection. 



    So anyway, I think there are gun nuts out there that like to walk around 
while open carrying and say Obama is trying to steal all our guns. I think 
they're crazy and need a bonk on the head to come to your senses. Try acting 
normal and conceal your weapon, don't talk like a crazy gun nut and try to 
realize you don't need a machine gun. 



    The government's job is to protect as many citizens as possible. That means 
more laws, more enforcement, and more compliance. We can't easily identify and 
stop all people who will commit a shooting crime. We can more easily target 
guns themselves and prevent the sale of them to as many "bad" people as 
possible. For "good" and legal people who want to buy one, stop complaining 
about gun control and embrace it in order to help save lives. Gun control isn't 
meant for good people, only the bad people. You'll still be able to buy any 
weapon you "need" in order to hunt or protect your home. 



    On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Gino Villarini <ginovi...@gmail.com> wrote:

      Freedom is not the exercise to choose whatever you want.  Heck then free 
all the child molesters! Human beings need to be controlled, that the whole 
reasoning behind laws.  Im with Jaime and Stefan on this.  



      On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:

        There are many items that kill more humans than first world guns.



        -----
        Mike Hammett
        Intelligent Computing Solutions
        http://www.ics-il.com




------------------------------------------------------------------------

        From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net>
        To: af@afmug.com
        Sent: Friday, October 9, 2015 11:21:43 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Campus Shootings

        Looking at this with a foreign view I can't understand this "gun love" 
in US. It is not all about the criminals or idiots. Just look at the statistics 
for accidents with weapons. The only way to save lifes is to be very 
restrictive. If someone wants to shoot he can go to a shooting club and leave 
the weapon there. It is not freedom to have a gun at home. It is silly esp. 
with kids around.

        You can't avoid killing with banning weapons but you can reduce it. If 
I need a weapon I call for police or security.











    -- 

    Darin Steffl

    Minnesota WiFi

    www.mnwifi.com

    507-634-WiFi

     Like us on Facebook


Reply via email to